Navigate to:

Thermal Performance

The tests were done on 2 CPUs across 2 different Intel Haswell platforms:

1) LGA 1150: Intel i7 4770k

This 4 core, 8 thread unlocked CPU is still one of the most popular mainstream CPUs from Intel. The newer i7 4790k is based off the same platform and performs the same clock to clock, while perhaps running a bit cooler. If anything, the older 4770k would benefit more from a custom loop. Sorry, no Skylake hardware here!

Motherboard: Asus ROG Maximus VI Formula
RAM: Corsair Dominator Platinum DDR3 1866 MHz (2x8gb)
CPU frequency: 4.7 GHz at 1.4 Vcore

2) LGA 2011-3: Intel i7 5960x

The behemoth 8 core, 16 thread unlocked CPU has a very high heat load due to 8 unlocked cores. Running at ~$999, it is one that benefits from a custom loop for sure.

Motherboard: Asus ROG Rampage V Extreme

RAM: Corsair Dominator Platinum DDR4 2666 MHz (4x4gb)
CPU frequency: 4.4 GHz at 1.3 Vcore

Testing methodology

Pump: Swiftech mcp35x2 set to 1.2 GPM
Controller: Aquacomputer Aquaero 6 XT
Radiator: HardwareLabs Black Ice Nemesis 480GTX with Noiseblocker NB-eLoop B12-3 fans at full speed
TIM: Gelid GC-Extreme

Everything required was placed inside the hotbox and the ambient temperature set to 25 ºC. TIM cure time was taken into consideration and 5 separate mounts/runs were done. For each run, a 90 minute Intel XTU stability test was performed. XTU is a stability test from HWBot that uses a custom preset of Prime 95 to ensure the load is uniform on each run. CPU core temperatures were measured using Aida64 and average core temperature was recorded at the end of each run. Loop temperatures were recorded using 2 inline and 1 stop plug type temperature sensor connected to the AQ6 and the average loop temperature was recorded at the end of each run. A delta T of CPU core and loop temperature was thus calculated for each run with an average delta T then obtained across all 5 runs. This way the cooling solution is taken out of the picture. The measurement cycle was done for both blocks in both orientations and the average is reported below with standard deviation accounted for.

As a reminder, this is the regular orientation:

and this is the goofy orientation:

Now on to the results:

Note: If you are viewing this on a mobile/tablet and the interactive charts do not show up properly then please check here- 4770k, 5960x

Now I must say that all the blocks don’t scale equally with flow rate. So keep that in mind since these results are at a set flow rate. Note also that each review result can only be taken to fit that particular CPU being tested out and your results may well vary- especially with non soldered IHS on CPUs. With that being said, we see that the Aquacomputer cuplex kryox NEXT is a very good performer, and so much so that is beat out everything else on the i7 5960x by a larger margin than most others albeit still within error margins of the experiment. The goofy orientation worked best here so it will help in terms of having the block oriented as Aquacomputer intended it to be. On the i7 4770k things were not as impressive, and possibly because of the non-uniform TIM spread, but it still took 3rd place overall which is nothing to shy about. Perhaps the VARIO version will help out here to get the best possible contact as all CPU IHS are not identical of course. As far as the TIM used here goes, a standard TIM was used but you will have similar or even slightly better results with the provided Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut so overall no complaints here. 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6