Navigate to:

Performance Testing

Testing methodology

Testing was done with the fan mounted one at a time on a single Swiftech MCR120QP radiator, with the fans controlled using a dedicated fan controller (Aquacomputer Aquaero 6 XT) in PWM or power (DC voltage) mode depending on the fan used. The controller also enabled RPM readout. Linear airflow was measured using an Extech 45158 Thermo-Anemometer 6″ away from the fan such that it measured the airflow in feet per minute through the radiator. Fan noise was measured in an anechoic chamber of size 5′ x 8′ with ambient noise level ~19 dBA and a sound probe held 6″ away to measure the sound volume in dBA accordingly. The fans were individually tested and the results below are averaged with a standard deviation calculated.


First up, I wanted to map out the RPM response curves to see if there was a significant difference between the fans controlled via PWM vs DC voltage control before measuring noise and airflow through the radiator.

Unfortunately, this PWM control issue wherein there is a massive drop in fan RPM going from 100% PWM duty cycle to even 99% PWM duty cycle on the Aquaero 6 is not new and it has been covered in more detailhere. The situation is still unclear at this point, but what is clear is this: some PWM controllers and the be quiet! Silent Wings 3 PWM fans do not get along very well. This can be remedied if you are handy with electronics and electrical engineering, or simply know someone who does. Thanks a lot to community member Darlene and her “Diva Adapter” I was able to test these fans again with an external pull-up logic in place:

That looks so much better. I am not an electrical engineer by trade nor will I pretend to understand exactly what is going on, it is for be quiet! to do so. But at this point, I will still suggest sticking with the voltage control versions unless you are aware of these potential, and I have to stress potential here as your motherboard PWM control setup may work just fine, control issues and want to go ahead.

Voltage control was more as I expected. Max RPM was 2126 at 12 V and both fans went down to 558 RPM at 4.2 V before shutting down. In fact, the fans shut down at 4.1 V and turned back on at 4.2 V so the claim of these fans having a low re-starting voltage is true. The RPM response is also very linear and only drops down at the last data point. There was also next to no sample to sample variability here (< 1%) which was nice to see. As such, I chose the DC version for noise and airflow measurements as well as fan comparison.

With the individual fan measurements done, let’s see how it compared with other 120 mm fans rated in the 1801-2200 RPM range. In order to not clutter up the plots, I am using only one fan from a series. For example, instead of there being 3 different EK Vardar 120 mm fans here (F3-120, F4-120, F4-120ER), I am having only one as these are generally identically performing at the same fan speed.

The be quiet! Silent Wings 3 remains noise optimized and is the quietest fan in the middle regime of the fan RPM range here. Performance is average at best here, but enough to where these come out the best at lower-middle fan speeds. Very impressive! Based on what we see, perhaps the non High-Speed versions make more sense after all for most people where they perform relatively best. These will come into play for that added boost in performance and those with fan controllers will be happy with these given the freedom to be where they wish to in the regime of operation.

(Edit: October 23, 2016) Upon request, here is a direct comparison between the be quiet! Silent Wings 3 120 mm High-Speed fan and the Corsair ML120 Pro 120 mm fan:

The story is more or less the same here, with the be quiet! fan getting better at fan speeds < 1600 RPM or so although both are within error margins. The Corsair ML120 Pro is better at higher fan speeds.

Pages: 1 2 3 4